![]() The same limitations harass the stock brokers in the Wall Street (Blodget, 2004), and doctors (Groopman, 20007). These limitations fail all our effortful endeavors to make perfect rational decision, and maximize our expected value. It is unavoidable for human being to make errors in decision making, because of our limitation of time, physical, cognitive, emotional and other resources. A summary of two open-ended questions is also included below.Įveryone knows the old saying, “ To err is human”. Then it drops noticeably to Presentation, SuperLab, ERTS, and finally SuperLab Pro and NESU. E-Prime, both flavors of PsyScope, and DMDX are highly recommended. Psyscope pro mac os#People are running away from PsyScope classic in droves, probably because the classic Mac OS is very quickly approaching end-of-life. PsyScope X has the highest "sticking with" rate, and E-Prime, SuperLab, MatLab, and DMDX all have 50%+ "sticking with" ratings. MatLab, SuperLab, and Presentation rank below that, ending with NESU, PsyScope classic, and SuperLab Pro. DMDX nets the highest satisfaction rating, with PsyScope X and E-Prime a smidge lower. Presentation and MatLab were both seen as notably difficult for novices. E-Prime and PsyScope were rated a shade harder for novices, and then from ERTS to SuperLab Pro to DMDX to NESU, novice-ease ratings dropped. SuperLab was seen as easiest for novices. Presentation and MatLab are notably the hardest of the commonly used packages. DMDX and NESU are seen as slightly harder. E-Prime, PsyScope, SuperLab, and ERTS are all rated as easy to build experiments with, and about equally so. Here's a one-paragraph summary of the survey results details below: E-Prime is the most popular package of those surveyed, but the majority of folks are using either E-Prime, DMDX, or some flavor of PsyScope. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |